Is the Roman Empire a friend or a foe in Acts?

4 Responses

• Comments 4
• Pingbacks 0

1. I think scholars need to give more consideration to protective silences in Acts and Paul. For example, Luke must have known about Paul’s collections, and supported them, but he fails to explicitly mention the collection from Macedonia and Achaia. Nor does Luke explain the plot of 20:3. Surely the Jews told the Romans that Paul’s collection did not qualify as part of their temple tax and therefore lacked permission from Rome. The delegates could get into trouble. Paul protects them by giving them anonymity (2 Cor 8:16-18; 12:18), and Luke protects them by staying silent about the collection. For more on this, see my 2023 Nov Test article.

   Reply

2. Interesting thought. I shall read your article with interest.

   Reply

3. Concerning Sosthenes, see my articles on naming here:https://tyndalebulletin.org/article/29418-name-giving-by-paul-and-the-destination-of-acts
   and here:
   https://tyndalebulletin.org/article/29186
   I argue that Gallio allowed the Jews to beat up Crispus-Sosthenes, their benefactor who had become a Christian.

   Reply

4. Thanks Richard. I’ll look forward to reading your article when I come to that point in the commentary writing.

   Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.